Reply to comment


Why are anesthesiologists who live and practice in the "big city" the first to argue for CRNA practice to be subject to physician supervision ?

Why aren't rural physicians and surgeons, those most likely to work with CRNAs, arguing to maintain supervisory responsibility ?

It would seem that those physicians that actually work with CRNAs would be the first to weigh in if nurse anesthetists were as undereducated and dangerous as anesthesiologists claim.

Opt outs have been happening since 2001, why aren't the 15 states that have opted out reversing their decisions if unsupervised CRNA practice is not safe ?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>

More information about formatting options

Subscribe


Subscribe Now and get the newest stories from CRNAbiz.com to your email address

Follow us on Facebook

Search

Syndicate

Syndicate content